由設計來改造設計

由設計來改造設計

2008台灣室內設計大獎評審團決審主委

姚政仲先生

中華民國室內設計協會理事長

由設計來改造設計

2008年台灣室內設計大獎主辦單位採用初選、複選、決選的評審方式，二輪三階段的評選，以確保每件參加作品都能被評審團成員多次重覆審視。參賽作品從設計觀念的創新、設計內容的落實到表現風格的一致性及執行完整性，都是評審從初選到複選階段評選時的討論重點，來自建築、室內、時尚、平面、廣告、媒體等領域，有著多元專業背景及豐富閱歷的評審委員，試圖由各自的專業思維，從當代室內設計菁英的二岸三地各類參賽作品中，尋找出能勾勒當代生活美學的設計作品。經由複選階段投票、討論選出的作品，顯現評審團對進入決選名單的作品，能同時兼顧設計及創作的理想性與專業性。

歷經初選、複選進入決選的作品，在決審過程中，國際及台灣評審以不同方位的思維，在專業與理想的交互討論辯證下，設計作品的廣度與深度都受到嚴謹的檢視。總結台灣室內設計大獎的評選過程，我們看到評審團期待在台灣室內設計大獎的作品中，尋找能超越專業表現的理想意義，僅有專業與創意的作品，未必能完全符合評審對金獎作品的期待。設計作品呈現對社會及環境的改造理想，設計師以具體的設計方法，尋找「由設計來改造設計」的可能性，從而以設計作品改造我們生活的實質環境，進而改變我們認為設計僅是做為服務性的專業工具的觀念，讓金獎作品從眾多決選作品中脫穎而出。從作品的完整度及精緻度來看，獲獎作品雖不是參賽作品中表現最好的，但是從設計的觀念性與理想性來看，今年台灣室內設計大獎的金獎作品，以創新的設計思維來改造生活環境的努力方向，將引領大眾重新認識室內設計師工作的社會意義。

2008 Comments by the Juror 

Mr. Yao, Cheng Chung, Director of Chinese Society of Interior Designers (CSID) in Taiwan

chairman of TID Award Final Juror Panel

Final Juror Comment：To Change Design by Design

The TID Award of 2008, organized by CSID, adopted a three-round jury process with an initial, semi-final and final round. This assured that every work could be reviewed by the panel in detail. The important criteria for winning design from initial to final jury were innovation in design concept, completeness in design execution and coherence in presentation. The jurors, with professional backgrounds and experiences, came from various professions including architecture, interior, fashion, graphic, commercial and media design. Their expertise allowed them to find designs by today’s interior design elites that can represent modern living aesthetics. After voting and discussion in the jury processes, the final entries showed both vision and professionalism.

In the final jury, Taiwanese jurors and guest jurors in Europe reviewed the entries in scrutiny, with regard to the works’ scope and depth. To sum it up, in the TID Award process, we saw that the jury panel expected to find in TID entries works that can transcend professionalism to present a vision; works that were only professional and innovative didn’t necessarily meet the expectation of the jurors for the Gold Award. The winning design projects presented visions to change our society and environment. The designers actively designed to find possibilities to “change design by design”, to use their works to change our actual living environment, and further change our preconception that design is merely a tool in the service sector. These were the reasons the Gold Award winners stood out from others. Regarding completeness and sophistication, the winning entries were not necessarily the most qualified, but regarding design concept and vision, this year’s Gold Award winners were the best in their endeavor to change the living environment through innovative designs. They will lead the people to get to know all over again the social impact of interior designers.