台北、台中室內設計、裝潢、庭園設計、系統家具

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

公告板
 [2011-01-15]歡迎光臨裝潢設計資訊網
 [2011-02-19]系統家具相關問題
 [2011-01-31]室內設計系統家具問題歡迎指教!
瀏覽模式: 普通 | 列表
Rechecked Translation 國內外決審金獎評審評語091125修正
整體感言:

第二階段決審之評審觀點:

姚政仲 台灣室內設計大獎主席

評審觀點:當代華人生活意向

今年TID大獎的參賽作品類型涵蓋到更多的生活層面,國內外評審都一致認為作品的廣度與深度均有顯著提升。建立大獎權威性與影響力的評審團成員,歷年均由國內外知名藝術、設計、媒體等領域專家學者組成,目的在於匯聚各領域工作者的觀點,從設計、文化、社會等層面評析作品的表現與內涵,避免僅從設計角度著眼評審的侷限性,專業表現、設計創意、時代意義等都是評核作品的重點。

TID大獎最值得注意的部分,除了觀察與記錄台灣室內設計大獎參賽作品的年度專業表現,來自兩岸各地設計作品中所呈現的各式各樣當代「生活空間」的面貌,更是研究當代華人生活意向與區域生活文化的重要場域。從作品內容除了可以一窺華人生活的環境與內涵,更可從中了解時代風格的形成與意義。

相較於台灣擅於形塑人文面貌與空間意境,香港精於時尚氛圍及空間風格的表現,大陸則長於營造視覺意象與空間樣式。而這也讓今年得獎作品共同展現「創造當代生活意象」的設計特質。室內設計是生活的具體表現,設計師透過詮釋生活型式與空間型態的創作理念,所形塑出生活空間的美學風格,即是「創造當代生活意象」。歷年台灣室內設計大獎的參賽作品對傳統與現代文化的轉換、東方與西方設計元素的融合,提出許多時代性的創作觀點,正可以看到華人的空間設計美學逐漸有別於歐美日的設計潮流,肯定的是,屬於當代華人生活空間的美學風格正在成型!

黃永洪黃永洪設計顧問公司

評審觀點:設計回歸生活

再次參與TID決選評審,較特別的是有一個較為極端的現象。首先是洗鍊成熟的作品增加了,但相對的,裡頭又反而欠缺了那麼一點作品本身應有的獨特性。反倒是有另一類的作品可以看出設計者企圖以不同思維與設計概念來表達作品本身個性以及作品的獨創性,但以專業設計的角度來看,卻又不夠成熟。

TID是一個走向國際的獎項,當我們將視野拉高來看一些國際設計競賽,可以發現在之中展露頭角的新秀,他們作品卻往往具備上述的兩種特質。這個現象可反推是否是他們的生活土壤裡已具備所需的深度與養分,以致於這些新秀開始接觸設計時,便能將這兩者掌握的很平衡。設計最終仍是回歸、落實於生活,這一點,或許是在台灣這塊土地操作設計的設計者,必須深思熟慮之處。

蔣 勳 詩人‧藝評人‧畫家‧作家

評審觀點:沒有中心信仰的生活態度,就沒有真正的「美學」

每一年協會主辦的設計大獎,在華人世界有越來越多的設計者參加。從住宅的設計到商業設計,從非永久展示空間的設計到公共空間的設計。在設計的領域,開拓了更多的不同性質的分類思維。使不同社區的華人,有彼此觀摩對話的機會,也有機會反觀省視自己社群文化中對「設計」「空間美學」現階段的水平,或未來發展的可能。

「住宅」可能不再只是建築形式外在淺薄的造形設計遊戲,同時也更牽連到人類文明對「家」的意義做更新穎也更切近現實的哲學思考。「商業空間」也可能不再只是炫耀消費的奢華與功利目的,而是更深刻地重新思維物質與精神的均衡,重新釐清人類消費文化如何在重重自然危機發生時更有遠見地節制自己對消費物質的態度。

「設計」沒有中心信仰的生活態度,就沒有真正的「美學」可言!祝賀今年從眾多參賽者中脫穎而出的獲獎者。

張光民 台灣創意設計中心執行長

評審觀點:室內設計是一種整合性之設計

本(98)年8月25日台灣創意設計中心辦理第一屆「金點設計獎」評選時,受邀來台擔任評選之國際評審委員,對經由2008 TID AWARD選出進入該獎空間設計類之參選作品水平一致給予肯定,咸認為優於其他(工業設計、視覺傳達設計及包裝設計)類之作品;再看進入2009 TID AWARD之決選作品水準,比起去年又往上提升不少,足見TID AWARD之公正性、權威性已獲得業界之認同,可喜可賀。

一件好的室內設計作品,?不是由設計師去自我表現,而是要為業主找到最合適處理空間的答案,這個答案必須具備獨到之處且要與眾不同,這才是設計師的創意,決選時有幾件作品就有這樣的特質,讓評審一致肯定;再者室內設計是一種整合性之設計,人在閱讀空間是全面的,尤其公共空間、商業空間之設計更甚之;一行文字的編排、一個小標示,都可能影響空間美學之觀感,卻常常為設計者所忽視。在這次決選時也樂見年青一代之設計師有不錯的表現,他們的成就未來是可期待。

各類金獎之評語: 
‧M宅

決審團評語:「M宅」表現出在自然環境裡,將建築、室內、庭園與景觀精細鑲嵌為一體的設計理念,儀式性的空間形式中有著寫意自然的人文韻味。

‧軸線交響曲

決審團評語:「軸線交響曲」,以精簡的空間層次運用、造型手法,創造出獨特的空間意境,象徵性的室內外空間軸線,延續著生活與環境的即興對話氛圍。

‧PEGA D&E材質色彩實驗室

決審團評語:「PEGA D&E材質色彩實驗室」。以尊重人性的角度對工作環境的創新詮釋,在空間與工作的收放之間建構人與工作關係的新空間秩序。

‧影子的香氣

決審團評語:以理性與感性兼具的設計思維,創造產品、空間、消費者的場所關係。在抽象與具象之間,以樸素的空間印象來顯現產品自然的本質

‧港澳直升機場貴賓候機室

決審團評語:流線光澤的空間形體結合現代科技造型,將原本緊迫的空間限制轉化成流動延展的有機體,整體空間形象表現出華美炫麗的視覺風格。

‧潮爆

決審團評語:「潮爆」。空間造型表現強烈鮮明的視覺感,多功能的創新展出方式可因應不同的時間與環境,移動拆卸再重組的環保展覽空間。

‧生機美學館

決審團評語:「生機美學館」以環境、景觀、室內,圍塑出園林與建築的空間相應之美。框景式的建築風格結合穿引園林的迴廊,勾勒出生活與自然融合的都會園林面貌。

‧紅盒子

決審團評語:「紅盒子」以造型、視覺、空間,創造多元功能的都市景觀家具,融合傳統與現代感的立體雕塑造型兼具街道家具與公共藝術的都會意象。

‧中國國民黨永久展場

決審團評語:「中國國民黨永久展場」。開放式的展覽方式結合天圓地方的空間概念,或立或坐的環型展場,以融合的形式、平易的氛圍展現舊政黨的新時代形象。


Thoughts on the Entire TID Award Process:

Phase Two Jury Committee Comments:

Yao Cheng Chung, Chairman of the TID Award

Juror Comment: Chinese Modern Living

This year’s TID Award entries included an even broader design scope for living. International and domestic jurors all unanimously agreed that the scope and depth of the projects have obviously improved. Over the years, the jurors who stand for the authoritativeness and impact of the award included international and domestic renowned professionals and scholars in the areas of art, design, media and etc. The goal is to collect the viewpoints of people from different job domains, that is, to review and analyze a project’s presentation and content from the viewpoints of design, culture, society and etc. This is to avoid the limitation of using only the designer’s viewpoint. Professional presentation, design creativity and timeliness are all important aspects for evaluating projects.

For the TID Award, the most important aspect to pay attention to is not only to observe and record projects’ professional presentations of contemporary “living space” features that come from across the strait as well as domestically. It is also more about studying the intention of contemporary living styles and local living cultures of Chinese descents today. From project contents, the living environment and cultural depth can be seen, and furthermore the formation and meaning of the style of the time can be understood.

Wong, Wing Hung,WONG & WONG ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS

Juror Comment: Design Living

The winners were chosen from the following five categories:

Participating again in the TID final jury committee, I realized what seems to be more particular this year is that there is a phenomenon of extremity. First of all, there is an increase in mature/professional works. However, in contrast, these works tend to lack that particular uniqueness a project should have. On the other hand, there are some works that show the designer’s intent to apply different thinking and design concepts to express the project’s innate character and uniqueness. However, from professional designer’s point of view, these works tend to be less mature.

TID Award is an award that is becoming international. When we broaden our horizon to see some international design competitions, we can discover new design vanguards. However, their projects tend to embody both of the above mentioned characteristics. From this phenomenon we can deduce whether or not these design vanguards are on solid ground with adequate insight depth and nutrient. Thus when these vanguards start approaching design, they can balance the two sides well. Design in the end is still all about going back to the basics and establishing it in daily living. This perhaps is an important point for designers of Taiwan to contemplate upon.

Hsun Chiang, Poet, Art Critic, Painter and Literati

Juror Comment: “ Heart ” of Design

Every year TID Award attracted more and more designers of Chinese descent to participate in. The design categories range from residential to commercial design and from temporal exhibition space to public space design. It has started a new thinking on categorizing more spatial typologies. This Award allows people of Chinese descent from different communities to have opportunities to observe each other and also introspect on ones own community regarding the present level of “design”, “spatial aesthetics”, or even possibilities for future developments.

“Residential design” is probably no longer only a shallow design game about architectural form/appearance. At the same time, it is connected to a fresh and more practical philosophical thinking about how humanity/culture redefines “home”. “Commercial space” is also probably no longer about showing off the sumptuousness and money-driven consumerism. It is more about rethinking in depth the balance between materialism and soul. It is reestablishing an attitude toward how consumerist culture should control itself with more foresight in a time when countless nature crises hit.

“Design” without heart for daily living is not really “aesthetics”! Here I want to congratulate the outstanding winners of this year’s participants.

Tony K.M. Chang, CEO of Taiwan Design Center

Juror Comment: Integrative Design

On August 25, 2009, Taiwan Design Center organized the first annual “Golden Pin Design Award” selection process. The invited international jurors unanimously gave recognition to the 2008 TID Award winner projects and felt that these spatial design projects are better than design projects of other categories such as industrial design, graphic design, or packaging design. Also, we can see that the project standard of the finalists of the 2009 TID Award has improved from last year. Thus, we can see that the fairness and authoritativeness of the TID Award have been approved by the design field.

A good interior design project is not only a self-expression of the designer, but rather a most suitable spatial design solution for the client. This solution needs to have particularity and uniqueness specific to the client. Only then is this a designer’s creation. During the final round, some projects have this kind of characteristic and were unanimously selected by the jurors. Also, interior design is a kind of integrative design. When a person reads a space, it is in its entirety. This is especially true for public and commercial spaces; the arrangement of a line of texts or a small sign can all possibly influence the presentation of spatial aesthetics. However, this is often overlooked by designers. In this year’s final round, it is a delight to see that young generation of designers have rather outstanding performance. Their future is very promising.

Comments on the TID Gold Award Projects:

‧House M

Final Jury Committee Comments: “House M” presents a design philosophy that sophisticatedly integrates architecture, interior design, and garden/landscape design in a natural environment. It is a ceremonial space in form that embodies culture naturally and freely.

‧Axial Symphony

Final Jury Committee Comments: This project uses minimal spatial layering and formation techniques to create a unique spatial ambiance. The symbolic axis of interior and exterior spaces extends from living spaces to the surrounding environment to allow instantaneous spatial dialogue.

‧PEGA GALLERY MATERIAL & COLOR LABORATORY

Final Jury Committee Comments: This project reinterprets the definition of workplace from humanitarian’s point of view. It balances space and work to construct a new spatial order based on human and work relationship.

‧Shadow

Final Jury Committee Comments: Using a design philosophy that embodies sense as well as sensibility, this project creates a spatial relationship that connects product, space and consumer. Between abstraction and concretization, this project uses an austere space to allow the products’ natural innate characteristics to emerge.

‧ Heliport VIP Lounge, Hong Kong

Final Jury Committee Comments: light flowing space combines with modern technological form to transfigure the existing tight and limiting space to a flowing and extending organic form. The entire space is presented in a resplendent and beautiful visual style.

‧Boom

Final Jury Committee Comments: This project’s spatial form presents a strong and bright visual effect. This environmental exhibition space with multifunctional and innovative exhibition methods can move, disassemble and reassemble according to different time and spatial need.

‧Live Forever

Final Jury Committee Comments: This project uses environment, landscape and interior space to construct a reciprocal spatial beauty between garden and architecture. The architecture that frames views integrates with the winding corridor that runs through the garden to narrate an urban landscape that merges daily living with nature.

‧The Red Box

Final Jury Committee Comments: This project uses form, visual effect and space to create multifunctional urban furniture. This project presents an urban image that integrates traditional and modern three-dimensional sculptural forms that are street furniture as well as public arts.

‧Kuomintang Permanent Exhibition Hall

Final Jury Committee Comments: This project is an open exhibition space that integrates with the spatial concept of a spherical sky. This circular exhibition hall can be propped up or down. Using integrative form and amiable atmosphere this project presents a new era image for the old political party.